say that the war in Afghanistan is a mission of peace is not only hypocritical veil semiotics. It is not just a matter of not calling things by their name. The fact is that, in times of crisis, things like this are called in another way would cost otherwise. War has become a mission of peace for economic reasons. Ah yes. Not much, but would cost. Money. For you see, perhaps not even that journalist raffle news La7, Carlos Mentana, who performs music in solos against the old, tired and march on Menzognini Tg1 and the empty container of Channel 5, Well even he says why do not you call (read it in silence) war. You can not call it that because otherwise the families of the victims should receive compensation. But if you call 'peace mission' dead 'relatives do not receive one euro. Wife and children without treatment provided by a war situation. E 'hypocrisy but so much so, what can you do. And 'the crisis, baby. Or really is not a war. But an American strategy, hatched by the CIA, to rebalance the global drug market, the backbone necessary for the modern capitalist and globalized economy. On Earth I read an article on the subject. But I brought it from an investigation di Enrico Piovesana, giornalista di PeaceReporter. Perciò qui di seguito vi riporto il suo di articolo, che è meglio:
Eroina afgana sui voli militari britannici di ritorno dal fronte. La notizia rafforza i sospetti sui reali interessi economici che si nascondono dietro la guerra in Afghanistan
La notizia, diffusa lunedì dalla Bbc , dei militari britannici e canadesi accusati di trasportare eroina in Europa sfruttando l'assenza di controllo sui voli militari di ritorno dal fronte, non fa che rafforzare i sospetti sui reali interessi economici che si nascondono dietro la guerra in Afghanistan .
Il traffico 'militare' di eroina scoperto tra le basi Nato nel sud dell'Afghanistan (Helmand e Kandahar) e l'aeroporto militare di Brize Norton , nell'Oxfordshire, verrà liquidato con la solita spiegazione delle 'mele marce', del caso isolato che riguarda solo alcuni individui.
Più probabilmente si tratta invece della punta dell'iceberg , o meglio delle briciole di un traffico ben più grande e strutturato che i suoi principali gestori - militari e servizi segreti Usa - lasciano ai loro alleati, evidentemente meno bravi di them not to be discovered.
Only a few months ago the German press had come out that one of the main agencies of private contractors in charge of the logistics of NATO bases in Afghanistan - the Ecolog , suspected of links with the Albanian mafia - was involved in trafficking Afghan heroin into Kosovo and Germany.
caused a sensation last year's revelation, the New York Times that Walid Karzai, brother of Afghan President and the main drug dealer in the province of Kandahar, was for years on the payroll of Cia.
"The U.S. military does not run counter drug production in Afghanistan because it earned them at least 50 billion dollars a year : it is they who carry the drugs with their overseas military aircraft, is not a mystery, "declared the summer of 2009 to Russia Today Russian general Mahmut Gareev .
Already in 2008 the Russian press, on the basis of intelligence information have not been denied by the then ambassador in Moscow to Kabul, Zamir Kabulov , revealed that the heroine is brought out of Afghanistan aboard U.S. military cargo directly into the bases of hooks, in Kyrgyzstan, and Inchirlik, in Turkey.
At the same time, an article appeared in the British newspaper Guardian reported the increasing rumors about the practice of the U.S. military in Afghanistan to hide drugs in the coffins of fallen Airborne abroad, filled with heroin instead the corpses of soldiers.
"Past experience in Indochina and Central America - was read, again in 2008, on the American Huffington Post - suggest that the CIA may be involved in the trafficking of Afghan drugs in a more heavier than what we already know. In both cases the CIA planes transporting drugs abroad on behalf of their local allies: the same could happen in Afghanistan. When the history of warfare has been written, the sordid Washington involvement in the trafficking of Afghan heroin is one of the most shameful chapters.
In 2002 the journalist Amerio Dave Gibson of Newsmax has quoted an anonymous U.S. intelligence source that "the CIA has been involved in global drug trafficking in Afghanistan and is merely carrying out what is his favorite deal, as he had already done during the Vietnam War .
According to historian Alfred McCoy Use , principal researcher of CIA involvement in drug trafficking in all theaters of war, Americans of the last fifty years (until the anti-Soviet Afghan resistance of the 80s) The main objective American occupation of Afghanistan was the recovery of opium production , unexpectedly prohibited from the year before Mullah Omar in hopes of gaining international recognition.
The facts and common sense seem to confirm the thesis of McCoy: After the 2001 invasion, the production and sale of Afghan opium (e dell'eroina) sono ripresi a livelli mai visti, polverizzando in pochi anni i record dell'epoca talebana, mentre le truppe Usa e Nato si sono sempre rifiutate di impegnarsi nella lotta al narcotraffico , continuando a sostenere i locali signori della droga.
Rimane una domanda di fondo : perché mai gli apparati militari e d'intelligence americani, in teoria dediti alla sicurezza nazionale e internazionale, mirano da decenni al controllo del narcotraffico? Per la venalità dei loro vertici corrotti? Per garantirsi fondi neri per operazioni coperte? O forse dietro c'è qualcosa di più strategico e sistemico che, alla fine, riguarda realmente il maintenance of security?
The Director-General of the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), Antonio Maria Costa has implicitly answered this question, stating that the enormous funds derived from money laundering and drug trafficking are the lifeblood that guarantees the survival of the economic system American West in times of crisis.
'Most of the proceeds of drug trafficking, an impressive volume of money is poured into the legal economy to money laundering,''said Maria Costa in January 2009. This means introducing'' capital investment , funds that ended up in the financial sector, which is under obvious pressure (due to the global financial crisis, ed).''
''The money from drug trafficking is currently the only available liquid capital for investment,''continued the director of UNODC. ''In 2008, the cash was the main problem for the banking system and then this liquid capital has become an important factor. It seems that bank lending has been financed by money comes from drug trafficking and other illegal activities. And 'obviously difficult to prove, but there are indications that a number of banks has been saved by these means.''
0 comments:
Post a Comment