Wednesday, September 22, 2010

Free Build Your Own Buggy Plans

do not call it war: the Afghan strategy to bring the drugs in his place

say that the war in Afghanistan is a mission of peace is not only hypocritical veil semiotics. It is not just a matter of not calling things by their name. The fact is that, in times of crisis, things like this are called in another way would cost otherwise. War has become a mission of peace for economic reasons. Ah yes. Not much, but would cost. Money. For you see, perhaps not even that journalist raffle news La7, Carlos Mentana, who performs music in solos against the old, tired and march on Menzognini Tg1 and the empty container of Channel 5, Well even he says why do not you call (read it in silence) war. You can not call it that because otherwise the families of the victims should receive compensation. But if you call 'peace mission' dead 'relatives do not receive one euro. Wife and children without treatment provided by a war situation. E 'hypocrisy but so much so, what can you do. And 'the crisis, baby. Or
really is not a war. But an American strategy, hatched by the CIA, to rebalance the global drug market, the backbone necessary for the modern capitalist and globalized economy. On Earth I read an article on the subject. But I brought it from an investigation di Enrico Piovesana, giornalista di PeaceReporter. Perciò qui di seguito vi riporto il suo di articolo, che è meglio:

Eroina afgana sui voli militari britannici di ritorno dal fronte. La notizia rafforza i sospetti sui reali interessi economici che si nascondono dietro la guerra in Afghanistan

La notizia, diffusa lunedì dalla Bbc , dei militari britannici e canadesi accusati di trasportare eroina in Europa sfruttando l'assenza di controllo sui voli militari di ritorno dal fronte, non fa che rafforzare i sospetti sui reali interessi economici che si nascondono dietro la guerra in Afghanistan .
Il traffico 'militare' di eroina scoperto tra le
basi Nato nel sud dell'Afghanistan (Helmand e Kandahar) e l'aeroporto militare di Brize Norton , nell'Oxfordshire, verrà liquidato con la solita spiegazione delle 'mele marce', del caso isolato che riguarda solo alcuni individui.
Più probabilmente si tratta invece della
punta dell'iceberg , o meglio delle briciole di un traffico ben più grande e strutturato che i suoi principali gestori - militari e servizi segreti Usa - lasciano ai loro alleati, evidentemente meno bravi di them not to be discovered.
Only a few months ago the German press had come out that one of the main agencies of private contractors in charge of the logistics of NATO bases in Afghanistan - the
Ecolog , suspected of links with the Albanian mafia - was involved in trafficking Afghan heroin into Kosovo and Germany.
caused a sensation last year's revelation, the New York Times
that Walid Karzai, brother of Afghan President and the main drug dealer in the province of Kandahar, was for years on the payroll of Cia.
"The U.S. military does not run counter drug production in Afghanistan because it earned them
at least 50 billion dollars a year : it is they who carry the drugs with their overseas military aircraft, is not a mystery, "declared the summer of 2009 to Russia Today Russian general Mahmut Gareev .
Already in 2008 the Russian press, on the basis of intelligence information have not been denied by the then ambassador in Moscow to Kabul, Zamir Kabulov
, revealed that the heroine is brought out of Afghanistan aboard U.S. military cargo directly into the bases of hooks, in Kyrgyzstan, and Inchirlik, in Turkey.
At the same time, an article appeared in the British newspaper Guardian
reported the increasing rumors about the practice of the U.S. military in Afghanistan to hide drugs in the coffins of fallen Airborne abroad, filled with heroin instead the corpses of soldiers.
"Past experience in
Indochina and Central America - was read, again in 2008, on the American Huffington Post - suggest that the CIA may be involved in the trafficking of Afghan drugs in a more heavier than what we already know. In both cases the CIA planes transporting drugs abroad on behalf of their local allies: the same could happen in Afghanistan. When the history of warfare has been written, the sordid Washington involvement in the trafficking of Afghan heroin is one of the most shameful chapters.
In 2002 the journalist Amerio
Dave Gibson of Newsmax has quoted an anonymous U.S. intelligence source that "the CIA has been involved in global drug trafficking in Afghanistan and is merely carrying out what is his favorite deal, as he had already done during the Vietnam War .
According to historian Alfred McCoy Use
, principal researcher of CIA involvement in drug trafficking in all theaters of war, Americans of the last fifty years (until the anti-Soviet Afghan resistance of the 80s) The main objective American occupation of Afghanistan was the recovery of opium production , unexpectedly prohibited from the year before Mullah Omar in hopes of gaining international recognition.
The facts and common sense seem to confirm the thesis of McCoy: After the 2001 invasion,
the production and sale of Afghan opium (e dell'eroina) sono ripresi a livelli mai visti, polverizzando in pochi anni i record dell'epoca talebana, mentre le truppe Usa e Nato si sono sempre rifiutate di impegnarsi nella lotta al narcotraffico , continuando a sostenere i locali signori della droga.
Rimane
una domanda di fondo : perché mai gli apparati militari e d'intelligence americani, in teoria dediti alla sicurezza nazionale e internazionale, mirano da decenni al controllo del narcotraffico? Per la venalità dei loro vertici corrotti? Per garantirsi fondi neri per operazioni coperte? O forse dietro c'è qualcosa di più strategico e sistemico che, alla fine, riguarda realmente il maintenance of security?
The Director-General of the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), Antonio Maria Costa
has implicitly answered this question, stating that the enormous funds derived from money laundering and drug trafficking are the lifeblood that guarantees the survival of the economic system American West in times of crisis.
'Most of the proceeds of drug trafficking, an impressive volume of money is poured into the legal economy to money laundering,''said Maria Costa in January 2009. This means introducing''
capital investment , funds that ended up in the financial sector, which is under obvious pressure (due to the global financial crisis, ed).''
''The money from drug trafficking is currently the only available liquid capital for investment,''continued the director of UNODC. ''In 2008, the cash was the main problem for the banking system
and then this liquid capital has become an important factor. It seems that bank lending has been financed by money comes from drug trafficking and other illegal activities. And 'obviously difficult to prove, but there are indications that a number of banks has been saved by these means.''

Sunday, September 12, 2010

Wedding Program Format

Immigration

The meeting I had last night at the bar with Karim Metref (http://piemondo.over-blog.org) was really interesting. Karim told me about his latest book, about what he wrote about immigration. And that is that there are two gooders discourse that should be further developed. But I will not be instructive, therefore, I will tell you from a migrant who leaves the sub-Saharan Africa to undertake a long journey to Italy that its Eldorado Eldorado-is not. Well, he will spend all their belongings to cross the desert (do not know if any of the League there's ever been in the desert - do not apply the tourist resort!) sharing his sufferings with a large group of unfortunates. It 's easy to assume that the idea of \u200b\u200bthe trip was conceived in a deficient diet and in a precarious environment in terms of employment. So in mental conditions quite tragic, really. The migrant, here as a migrant, through a long process of natural selection where only the strongest will reach the European coast. Arrived on the shores of Libya will be some imprisoned and abused, tortured and killed some others will escape and be able to leave for Italy (think, that very country that allowed them to be abused and tortured and even killed). The lucky migrant (lucky depending on your point of view) will arrive in a country where it will be hated and despised by some, helped by others, but help was at the root of something controversial, confused. The migrant - in fettispecie it comes to immigrant - to hear him say analysts, sociologists, volunteer information, "the immigrant must be the Italian economy" or "the immigrant is the bearer of population growth."
But it can be really that easy? To say that immigrants are necessary to the Italian economy is a misnomer: we say 'affordable'. Yes, the immigrant agrees to immigration. And who would accept no fruits to gather, get to pay two euro for a day of work and then go to sleep abandoned in a silo? A black man, strong (remember that was selected by mother nature in the desert) and young. Yes, young man. Why migrate older mica. And so the Italian population is younger. More children who makes them? No one can afford them. And 'the real problem. And 'this is the reason the progressive aging of our country. And the various Maroni, Bossi, Calderoli Borghezio who work so hard to help the foreigner, the block in the bud (the immigrant immigration when it comes, not when lives his land) I think these things do not know? Obviously they know. But it is difficult to root out the evil at its root, a control system, even as defined by system Saviano, rotten, corrupt, lazy and hypocritical. Who is more guilty, in fact? The slave who would do anything to eat or contractor who knows that the worker does not exist workforce will suffer the cold in a property without water drinkable? Sure, I'm drunk Romanians and Moroccans to kill drug dealers, not the employers who employ at most. When Prodi increased control to combat tax evasion against all began. Now we think that this maneuver is probably not merely an economic but a social instrument: a way to solve immigration crazy. The economic control, the black market. But Prodi (even if you do not defend in toto, God forbid) was defeated because no television, and now we have to settle for political commercials that Berlusconi in politics through the slogan: "Less taxes for everyone."

Yes, and even less moral problems.

Wednesday, September 1, 2010

Waitress For Strip Club Job

explained to the bar I had a pound of ethics. I do, I leave?

Where to start? Starting dall'appurato fact that more than a dictator Colonel Gaddafi is true, I'm sorry that it has already gone to Rome. It 'was so short a visit. Short but intense. I already imagine that Berlusconi's villa at the exit of the dictator asked surprised: "But where do you go? Already? Bignola But take one more ..." Gaddafi and that a gesture of Amazon (which I thought was a legend, really do exist!) refuses cordially. And walk away. But not before he had signed several agreements and important. Important, yes.
But for whom? I wonder what he thinks
an immigrant, locked in a cell 1metrox1metro, when he sees the nation in which to land (in this case Italy, but it's just a guess!) And for which he had spent all his money, just to say the truth, see it agree with their country which desperately tries to escape. A dictator who makes agreements with Europe today? It 's like saying that the Americans made agreements with the Nazis or the Europeans 80s with South American dictators.
Good thing the TV is not there, not yet, in Libyan prisons where these God only knows if an immigrant comes out vivo per non tornarci. Senza tv non si sa nemmeno cosa stiano dicendo i due dittatori, pardon: il Colonello e il Cavaliere (ma Berlusconi in guerra andava a cavallo? Perché Cavaliere?). La tv non c'è, ma se ci fosse un po' d'acqua... Taci negro, gli direbbe Gheddafi, sono occupato in tutt'altro tipo di accordo.
E oltre alla tv meno male che non esiste stampa libera, come invece esiste da noi (ma davvero?). Altrimenti il povero immigrato prossimo alla morte (ma ci credete che in carcere in Libia si muore o no? Se aspettate Minzolini che ve lo dica... Guardatevi piuttosto il documentario "Come un uomo sulla Terra") avrebbe letto l'intervista fatta dall'organo informazionale La Stampa a pag.7 al sindaco leghista di Verona Flavio Tosi (che io mi chiedo: perché proprio lui?) il quale dice: "Se parliamo di etica dovremmo rompere con i cinesi". E ha ragione. Meglio non parlarne di etica. Per evitare di fare brutte figure. Tosi dice: "Ma scusate, le prove di verginità le esigiamo solo da Gheddafi? Io non dico che sia un santo ma se dovessimo ragionare da un punto di vista etico non avremmo più rapporti commerciali con mezzo mondo. L'Oriente, l'Africa, la Cina dove ogni anno ci sono 5mila esecuzioni capitali, il 90 per cento delle condanne a morte del mondo... E allora che facciamo, siccome sono un po' tiranni smettiamo di avere scambi?".
Eh già. Sono solo un po' tiranni. Che sarai mai? Ma siamo obiettivi, Tosi su una cosa ha ragione: la politica knows no ethics. Otherwise you do not make economic agreements, no progress is made, it remains poor. Ethics is now a waste product. I guess my grocery store who asks
"I had a pound of ethics. What do I leave?"
"Please, take it off, take it off. It hurts to digestion. And a whole more than that." We first
to concrete things. A magna. And who else can we do? Unions on any wrongful death of a poorly paid worker in China? Ohhh, will be 2 billion, which will never be one more or one less.
And then you are talking about politics or economics? We talk about the economy, indeed of Economics flower blossoms because companies want to put your finger in the Libyan ones most are in Italy: Eni, Finmeccanica, Enel, Impregilo, Sai, Unicredit, Telecom and Confindustria. Ah yes, there is also Ben Ammar, the Tunisian entrepreneur friend of Berlusconi who has enjoyed making the film Baarìa, internationally acclaimed blockbuster.
But back to us. We talk about the economy. Nothing more. But Berlusconi and Gaddafi are economies?
No, they must ensure that you, the workers laid off, you get to eat later this month. Only at the end of the month. The other 30 nights to fix it. But it's a start. Then you eat on the shoulders of a Libyan who got to do? Everyone thinks their wellbeing. And as also said Tosi, "Gaddafi has certainly done that that is, from the Libyan point of view, the national interest. "But of course. With the money that will come to Libya are convinced that the Colonel will feed the entire country. The faint Gaddafi for his people. if only multiply the loaves and fishes he was a Christian. Via the evil from Libya. With only 5 billion, Gadhafi has urged the European Union to combat illegal immigration (not to pay those who would do first if they want to go?), could open new prisons and lock up immigrants , which could make Europe more like the Libyan leader said, "black". 'sti blacks.' sti zozzone. But more police, more jobs: this must be the slogan.
Back to you , worker layoffs in: you do not have to worry about anything. We think the top for you. Forget ethics and everything will be smoothly (the malicious would say this with a sweep of the arm that mimics the arrival of something sharp in the backside).
But, Mr. Commander, I do not know if later this month c'arrivo time. My wife is a teacher (and she has already learned all I think) and I've got two children. Ste holiday I did not know where to take the creatures! But he says, c'arivo?
Of course, trust us.
But it's not that I eat on the shoulders of some misfortune?
What do you mean? We are not beasts us. We are politicians! Do it like this: If you feel guilty bids in the Church (Christian or Koran does the same), for the poor. You'll see that you're better. And your kids take it to a supermarket there as well air conditioning. All be better.
better.

Yes, better. You better give me a bucket, I'm going to vomit.