La Camera Penale di Bolzano prende atto della Delibera della Giunta della Camera Penale di Nola del 23 gennaio 2010, della Delibera della Giunta dell’Unione Camere Penali dell’1 febbraio 2010, nonché della delibera della Council of the Criminal Chamber of Nola on February 18, 2010, which was proclaimed to abstain from criminal hearings on 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16 March 2010, and shared the reasons for protest, plans to make its views in this regard.
The Criminal Chamber of Nola was an issue of national significance, the importance of which was immediately implemented by the Government dell'UCPI, which - in his acting - he reiterated that the constitutional principles of due process and equal parts can never be sacrificed - "pain and injustice of the process of decision" - only to allow a "reasonable period the process. "
The topic is therefore of vital importance, not only the most delicate processes or for the crimes provided by art. 51, par. 3-bis cpp
This is primarily to reject conceptions of the process of authoritarian and as a means of social defense, summary or general prevention.
The fight against crime, organized or not, is pursued through the process.
We must also emphasize the role of the Ombudsman in a process and finally the liberal democratic system which ensures the possibility of an effective defense, in accordance with the procedural safeguards and the additional time required to reach a just decision. The Criminal Chamber
Nola has proved and demonstrated not only awareness of the difficulties involved in the handling of the process that orginato the protest, but sought also to stress that the lawyer can not be considered cumbersome obstacle or, alternatively, insignificant accessory .
Ask the criteria that regulate the activity of taking evidence, expressing the need to know quickly the texts of the accusation, to be examined at the hearing, lamenting the difficulty of ensuring adequate protection for a scheduling hearings (four weekly interviews lasting 10-12 hours) which does not allow [ed] among others in-depth study of the pleadings or to prepare the business for the subsequent hearings, make procedural exceptions, perform properly and fully on-examination: well, all part of the duties of the Ombudsman, which - as a guarantor of the rule of law - not never abdicate its constitutional function and the exercise of the right to properly defend the interests of the citizen.
The Criminal Chamber of Nola el'UCPI ribadireche have therefore understood to be of primary interest to all, respecting the roles, firstly to ensure the quality of the process and not to satisfy media demands of justice "for short routes," perhaps in account the seriousness of the offenses charged.
are therefore completely unfounded, and therefore to be rejected with force, the attacks by the press and ANM to the Criminal Chamber of Nola and the resolution dell'UCPI, designed to exploit legitimate requests from the Defenders , labeled as a deliberate attempt to lengthen the process, thereby encouraging dangerous criminals at the expense of justice.
He comes therefore the logic of emergency and fear, the appeal of the square and populist views, shortcuts and to justify deviations from the rules or even unacceptable to propose different schemes in terms of both substantive law, is especially the case. And so, it is intended to reaffirm the need for a "double track", breaking free from even the minimum rules for the warranty, in deference to a conception of the criminal law of the enemy ", an expression of instances - the symbolic and emotional - safety and prevention.
The problem is also wider and has been repeatedly highlighted dall'UCPI
The temptation of a short process (at any cost) and TOC, so extremely unjust, it is always lurking.
Bills allegedly designed to ensure the streamlining of criminal trials were and are actually tending to collapse the defense guarantees, così come le sempre più numerose leggi emergenziali sacrificano spazi necessari per una effettiva difesa.
In questo contesto, in varie sedi di Tribunale si stigmatizza addirittura l’attività difensiva, laddove questa tenda ad esercitare compiutamente le proprie prerogative e la propria funzione, così come alcuni esponenti di spicco della Magistratura ribadiscono in trasmissioni televisive l’esigenza di accelerare processi, sopprimendo gradi di giudizio.
La Camera Penale di Nola ha avuto dunque il merito di riproporre con forza il dibattito avviato dall’U.C.P.I. sulla natura, l’essenza e la qualità del processo, che deve ispirarsi sempre ai principi costituzionali del contraddittorio, in condizioni di parità delle Parti, davanti ad un Giudice che dovrà essere terzo.
In considerazione di quanto precede, la Camera Penale di Boliazano esprime la propria solidarietà alla Camera Penale di Nola ed all’iniziativa di protesta intrapresa, condividendo tutte le osservazioni espresse nella delibera dell’U.C.P.I. dell’1 febbraio 2010.
Bolzano, lì 5 marzo 2010.
Il Presidente
Avv. Beniamino Migliucci
0 comments:
Post a Comment