Back! Something has changed
After a bit 'of time, I decided to put his hand to my blog. Forget everything I've written before. Yes, it could be a good idea to talk about the daily events, politics, the environment, in the form of plots of films. But I'm tired.
Now the blog I need to write what I like to write for newspapers. But I can not do it. Want to inexperience, either because it gives me the chance, or because the newspaper market is another example of non-meritocracy, or because the information sector is essentially no money. There is little space, do not say that I deserve it, which are better than others, and I do not want the victim of the system: a blog I need to put pen to paper, even if digital, what I see on paper. Ideally at least I'll be satisfied. This is the new
valelapenascrivere.
For anyone who wants to read, welcome back.
Thursday, July 15, 2010
Sunday, June 27, 2010
What Are A Good Type Of Halogen Pot Light
THE CHAMBER OF CRIMINAL BOLZANO abstention from acting HEARINGS FROM 7 TO 14 JULY. THE TEXT OF THE DECISION OF 25/06/2010.
Here is the text of the Resolution dd. 25.06.2010 of the Criminal Chamber of Bolzano.
"acting ABSTENTION
The Directors of the Criminal Chamber of Bolzano, the emergency meeting following a report received by the lawyer. Marco Ferretti difensore di G.S.,
rilevato
che il Sostituto Procuratore della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Bolzano dott. Axel Bisignano con decreto di data 17/6/2010 ha disposto la perquisizione personale dell’indagato e della cella della Casa circondariale ubicata in Bolzano, via Dante, presso la quale si trovava ristretto, al fine di sequestrare appunti difensivi, da lui redatti, in relazione ai fatti specificamente contestati allo stesso;
che le ragioni della perquisizioni venivano indicate nei seguenti termini:
“sono emersi ulteriori elementi indizianti anche a carico di terze persone che necessitano di approfondimento;
in particolare, da articoli comparsi sulla stampa emerge che l’indagato "Want to talk about [...] Also during the interrogation of warranty, the suspect is using notes he had prepared, containing, obviously, circumstances relevant to the findings of fact and, in particular, useful information in relation to the involvement of other person in the phenomenon of widespread corruption revealed "
, therefore, the search has been ordered to acquire notes taken from inquiring held for defensive purposes in aid of memory;
that the seizure of documents and pleadings shall be prohibited from ' ordering and is very serious infringement of constitutional right under Article. 24, par. 2 of the Constitution;
that, recently, the court of Bolzano, by order of date of 06/06/2008, implementing peaceful principles, rejected the request of the prosecution to use documents obtained in the PC of a defendant and drawn by him for defensive purposes;
that the question has also been professed ex addressed by the Constitutional Court with the well-known sentence nr. 229, 19.06.1998, extensor Prof. Giuliano Vassalli, with which it was stated inter alia that:
"Art. 237 Code of Criminal Procedure, which allows the acquisition, including office, any document emanating from the defendant, must be read in coordinated relationship with the constitutional principles for the protection of the human person and the right of defense of the accused and suspects, as well as the procedural rules laid in defense of those rights by limiting the incidence of invasive means of searching for evidence and precluding, therefore, the seizure of the pleadings that the accused has pinned itself to facilitate the answers to your questioning . "
that in the Grounds of the Constitutional Court states that the seizure of notes taken from asking for self-defense is considered" contrary to the rules of the process and directly violates constitutional principles. Indeed, the fact that the measure qualifies as a search function to the apprehension of the clipboard, ... results in a clear direct violation of the inviolable rights of the person even before the right to self-defense. So much to reveal the arrangement by the court of an instrument of that invasiveness of privacy (in noting that nothing in this case, the accused was in Vinculis), just to the right of vulnerable manned by art. 24, second paragraph of the Constitution, liable, moreover, as a covert criticism of the lesion in terms of interrogation rules dictated by the Code of Criminal Procedure.
In addition, through the use of instruments specified in a capacity-intrusive methods not unlike those of such art. 188 of the Code of Criminal Procedure precludes the possibility of use as such, which evidence that the results can be achieved. All according to the rules even before they were coded are the expression of the fundamental principles of legal culture "
that the measure, according to the Criminal Chamber, is illegal and detrimental to the immediate right of defense and individual rights, especially if in custody and therefore more vulnerable to acts of invasive dignity and personal freedom;
that the severity of the episode determines the need for a protest in defense of constitutional principles, the right of defense and the inviolable rights of the person in its fully extended;
proclaims
abstention from the hearings and any other legal activity, within the limits laid down in self-regulatory code of abstentions from the audience of lawyers
7 to 14 July 2010 and at the same time
calls
the Attorney General of the Court of Appeals of Trento, the Advocate General at the sub-office of the Court of Appeals of Bolzano and Trento Prosecutor at the Court of Bolzano to intervene, as the responsibility, under Article. 16 of Royal Decree 31 May 1946, No 511.
Leave this resolution to the Board of the Union of Italian Criminal Chambers and recipients indicated in Art. 2 of the Code of self-regulation.
Bolzano, there June 25, 2010.
President Mr. Benjamin Migliucci
The Board Attorney Elena Valenti - Mr. Federico Fava "
Here is the text of the Resolution dd. 25.06.2010 of the Criminal Chamber of Bolzano.
"acting ABSTENTION
The Directors of the Criminal Chamber of Bolzano, the emergency meeting following a report received by the lawyer. Marco Ferretti difensore di G.S.,
rilevato
che il Sostituto Procuratore della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Bolzano dott. Axel Bisignano con decreto di data 17/6/2010 ha disposto la perquisizione personale dell’indagato e della cella della Casa circondariale ubicata in Bolzano, via Dante, presso la quale si trovava ristretto, al fine di sequestrare appunti difensivi, da lui redatti, in relazione ai fatti specificamente contestati allo stesso;
che le ragioni della perquisizioni venivano indicate nei seguenti termini:
“sono emersi ulteriori elementi indizianti anche a carico di terze persone che necessitano di approfondimento;
in particolare, da articoli comparsi sulla stampa emerge che l’indagato "Want to talk about [...] Also during the interrogation of warranty, the suspect is using notes he had prepared, containing, obviously, circumstances relevant to the findings of fact and, in particular, useful information in relation to the involvement of other person in the phenomenon of widespread corruption revealed "
, therefore, the search has been ordered to acquire notes taken from inquiring held for defensive purposes in aid of memory;
that the seizure of documents and pleadings shall be prohibited from ' ordering and is very serious infringement of constitutional right under Article. 24, par. 2 of the Constitution;
that, recently, the court of Bolzano, by order of date of 06/06/2008, implementing peaceful principles, rejected the request of the prosecution to use documents obtained in the PC of a defendant and drawn by him for defensive purposes;
that the question has also been professed ex addressed by the Constitutional Court with the well-known sentence nr. 229, 19.06.1998, extensor Prof. Giuliano Vassalli, with which it was stated inter alia that:
"Art. 237 Code of Criminal Procedure, which allows the acquisition, including office, any document emanating from the defendant, must be read in coordinated relationship with the constitutional principles for the protection of the human person and the right of defense of the accused and suspects, as well as the procedural rules laid in defense of those rights by limiting the incidence of invasive means of searching for evidence and precluding, therefore, the seizure of the pleadings that the accused has pinned itself to facilitate the answers to your questioning . "
that in the Grounds of the Constitutional Court states that the seizure of notes taken from asking for self-defense is considered" contrary to the rules of the process and directly violates constitutional principles. Indeed, the fact that the measure qualifies as a search function to the apprehension of the clipboard, ... results in a clear direct violation of the inviolable rights of the person even before the right to self-defense. So much to reveal the arrangement by the court of an instrument of that invasiveness of privacy (in noting that nothing in this case, the accused was in Vinculis), just to the right of vulnerable manned by art. 24, second paragraph of the Constitution, liable, moreover, as a covert criticism of the lesion in terms of interrogation rules dictated by the Code of Criminal Procedure.
In addition, through the use of instruments specified in a capacity-intrusive methods not unlike those of such art. 188 of the Code of Criminal Procedure precludes the possibility of use as such, which evidence that the results can be achieved. All according to the rules even before they were coded are the expression of the fundamental principles of legal culture "
that the measure, according to the Criminal Chamber, is illegal and detrimental to the immediate right of defense and individual rights, especially if in custody and therefore more vulnerable to acts of invasive dignity and personal freedom;
that the severity of the episode determines the need for a protest in defense of constitutional principles, the right of defense and the inviolable rights of the person in its fully extended;
proclaims
abstention from the hearings and any other legal activity, within the limits laid down in self-regulatory code of abstentions from the audience of lawyers
7 to 14 July 2010 and at the same time
calls
the Attorney General of the Court of Appeals of Trento, the Advocate General at the sub-office of the Court of Appeals of Bolzano and Trento Prosecutor at the Court of Bolzano to intervene, as the responsibility, under Article. 16 of Royal Decree 31 May 1946, No 511.
Leave this resolution to the Board of the Union of Italian Criminal Chambers and recipients indicated in Art. 2 of the Code of self-regulation.
Bolzano, there June 25, 2010.
President Mr. Benjamin Migliucci
The Board Attorney Elena Valenti - Mr. Federico Fava "
Friday, March 26, 2010
Cover Letter To Staffing Company
resolution of the House FEES IN RELATION TO BOLZANO serious incident of beatings in prison in BOLZANO
Here is the text of the resolution of the Criminal Chamber of Bolzano dd. 03/25/2010:
All'Ill. Mr mo.
Minister of Justice Ministry of Justice
Via Arenula n. 70 00186 Roma
All'Ill. mo Mr.
Head of Department of Prison Management Amm.ne
Largo Luigi Daga 2
No 00164 Rome
All'Ill. mo Mr.
superintendency superintendent for Reg Triveneto
of Prison Police
Piazza Castello n. 12
35014 Padova
All’Ill.mo sig. Direttore della
Casa Circondariale di Bolzano
Via Dante n. 30
39100 Bolzano
All’Ill.mo sig. Presidente della
Corte d’Appello di Trento
Largo Pigarelli n. 2
38122 Trento
All’Ill.mo sig. Procuratore della Repubblica
Procura Generale della Repubblica
presso la Corte d’Appello di Trento
Largo Pigarelli n. 2
38122 Trento
All’Ill.mo sig. Presidente della
Corte d’Appello di Trento
Sezione distaccata di Bolzano
Corso Libertà n. 23
39100 Bolzano
All'Ill. Mo Mr. Public Prosecutor
Attorney General's Office in the Court of Appeals Chamber office in Bolzano Trento
Freiheitsstraße No 23 39100 Bolzano
All'Ill. Mo Mr. President of the Court of Bolzano
Courthouse Square
Court No 1 39100 Bolzano
All'Ill. Mo Mr.
public prosecutor Public Prosecutor at the Court of Bolzano
Courthouse Square
Court No 1 39100 Bolzano
the Union Board Room Italian Criminal
Margutta No 17 00187 Roma
Prison Observatory
Union Rooms Italian Criminal
Margutta No 17 00187 Roma
All'Ill. Mo Mr. President of the Probate Court Probate Court of Bolzano
Manci GA No Way 6 / A 39100 Bolzano
Hon. The Lawyers Council of the Order of Bolzano
Courthouse Square
Court No 1 39100 Bolzano
pc
All'Ill. Mo Mr. President of the Autonomous Province of Bolzano Via Crispi
Building 1 No 3
39100 Bolzano
Subject: Resolution of the Criminal Chamber of Bolzano in relation to serious incidents of "beating" occurred in prison in Bolzano.
The Criminal Chamber of Bolzano, noted that was confirmed by official sources, the news published in some local newspapers that some people arrested in recent days for crimes of pedophilia have been victims of a violent assault in prison,
Notes
absolute severity of the episode, which was predictable as avoidable. It is well known, that the inclusion of persons in prisons invisible to the prison population for specific circumstances or the nature of the offenses charged, can lead to violent behavior and beatings by other prisoners. In this case, the arrest was performed pursuant to an order of taxation of a precautionary measure, which would allow the necessary coordination between courts and judiciary to investigate the possibility of the District Prison of Bolzano to ensure the safety of those arrested;
expresses
preoccuapazione, disapproval and bewilderment for what happened. Indeed, the law and the rules of a liberal democratic country and require it to ensure the physical safety of persons detained for any reason and for any offense. The Judicial Authority, normally, Prison Administration provides information about the existence of risks arrest Prison Administration of some subjects and shall avoid promiscuity with other prisoners, including through the establishment of protected sections. The overcrowding of the prison in Bolzano, the sacrifice of
guards, often in small staff, should not diminish in any way the importance of the event, while the policy must include the reasons for new prisons, and in modern to ensure the dignity of prisoners awaiting trial or during the execution of the sentence;
firmly reiterates that the current prison situation, at national and local levels, has become untenable and has increasingly assumed the traits of a "permanent emergency" does not permit the full respect of fundamental rights and dignity of the person, in open contradiction - on one hand - with the principle of innocence and - other - with the purpose of pay and "basically re-education" that our Constitution assigns to the sentence, coll'espresso rejection of any "treatment contrary to human dignity", in whatever way it is perpetrated;
learns with satisfaction that the incident INTED absolute clarity and any failure to prevent such facts can be repeated, which can not be ensured by identifying Only inmates who allegedly engaged in the beating;
asks that the Judicial Authority shall implement the arrests of wanted to consider the apparent impossibility of the Bolzano prison to ensure the safety of people hated the prison population .
Bolzano, there March 25, 2010.
The Directors of the Criminal Chamber of Bolzano
President Mr. Benjamin
F.to Migliucci
F.to Attorney Elena Valenti
F.to Mr. Federico Fava
Here is the text of the resolution of the Criminal Chamber of Bolzano dd. 03/25/2010:
All'Ill. Mr mo.
Minister of Justice Ministry of Justice
Via Arenula n. 70 00186 Roma
All'Ill. mo Mr.
Head of Department of Prison Management Amm.ne
Largo Luigi Daga 2
No 00164 Rome
All'Ill. mo Mr.
superintendency superintendent for Reg Triveneto
of Prison Police
Piazza Castello n. 12
35014 Padova
All’Ill.mo sig. Direttore della
Casa Circondariale di Bolzano
Via Dante n. 30
39100 Bolzano
All’Ill.mo sig. Presidente della
Corte d’Appello di Trento
Largo Pigarelli n. 2
38122 Trento
All’Ill.mo sig. Procuratore della Repubblica
Procura Generale della Repubblica
presso la Corte d’Appello di Trento
Largo Pigarelli n. 2
38122 Trento
All’Ill.mo sig. Presidente della
Corte d’Appello di Trento
Sezione distaccata di Bolzano
Corso Libertà n. 23
39100 Bolzano
All'Ill. Mo Mr. Public Prosecutor
Attorney General's Office in the Court of Appeals Chamber office in Bolzano Trento
Freiheitsstraße No 23 39100 Bolzano
All'Ill. Mo Mr. President of the Court of Bolzano
Courthouse Square
Court No 1 39100 Bolzano
All'Ill. Mo Mr.
public prosecutor Public Prosecutor at the Court of Bolzano
Courthouse Square
Court No 1 39100 Bolzano
the Union Board Room Italian Criminal
Margutta No 17 00187 Roma
Prison Observatory
Union Rooms Italian Criminal
Margutta No 17 00187 Roma
All'Ill. Mo Mr. President of the Probate Court Probate Court of Bolzano
Manci GA No Way 6 / A 39100 Bolzano
Hon. The Lawyers Council of the Order of Bolzano
Courthouse Square
Court No 1 39100 Bolzano
pc
All'Ill. Mo Mr. President of the Autonomous Province of Bolzano Via Crispi
Building 1 No 3
39100 Bolzano
Subject: Resolution of the Criminal Chamber of Bolzano in relation to serious incidents of "beating" occurred in prison in Bolzano.
The Criminal Chamber of Bolzano, noted that was confirmed by official sources, the news published in some local newspapers that some people arrested in recent days for crimes of pedophilia have been victims of a violent assault in prison,
Notes
absolute severity of the episode, which was predictable as avoidable. It is well known, that the inclusion of persons in prisons invisible to the prison population for specific circumstances or the nature of the offenses charged, can lead to violent behavior and beatings by other prisoners. In this case, the arrest was performed pursuant to an order of taxation of a precautionary measure, which would allow the necessary coordination between courts and judiciary to investigate the possibility of the District Prison of Bolzano to ensure the safety of those arrested;
expresses
preoccuapazione, disapproval and bewilderment for what happened. Indeed, the law and the rules of a liberal democratic country and require it to ensure the physical safety of persons detained for any reason and for any offense. The Judicial Authority, normally, Prison Administration provides information about the existence of risks arrest Prison Administration of some subjects and shall avoid promiscuity with other prisoners, including through the establishment of protected sections. The overcrowding of the prison in Bolzano, the sacrifice of
guards, often in small staff, should not diminish in any way the importance of the event, while the policy must include the reasons for new prisons, and in modern to ensure the dignity of prisoners awaiting trial or during the execution of the sentence;
firmly reiterates that the current prison situation, at national and local levels, has become untenable and has increasingly assumed the traits of a "permanent emergency" does not permit the full respect of fundamental rights and dignity of the person, in open contradiction - on one hand - with the principle of innocence and - other - with the purpose of pay and "basically re-education" that our Constitution assigns to the sentence, coll'espresso rejection of any "treatment contrary to human dignity", in whatever way it is perpetrated;
learns with satisfaction that the incident INTED absolute clarity and any failure to prevent such facts can be repeated, which can not be ensured by identifying Only inmates who allegedly engaged in the beating;
asks that the Judicial Authority shall implement the arrests of wanted to consider the apparent impossibility of the Bolzano prison to ensure the safety of people hated the prison population .
Bolzano, there March 25, 2010.
The Directors of the Criminal Chamber of Bolzano
President Mr. Benjamin
F.to Migliucci
F.to Attorney Elena Valenti
F.to Mr. Federico Fava
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)